Legal Opinion

Hull v. Swarthout

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1874PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal in Chancery from Ionia Circuit.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

The bill in this case is filed to foreclose a mortgage given by defendants to Albert Van Vleck to secure the payment of a note for fifteen hundred dollars, payable to Van Vleck or order on or before May 1,1871, and another for seven hundred and ninety dollars, payable in like manner on or before December 1, 1871, both of which bore date January 24, 1871, and were given for puchase money of the land described in the mortgage. From the evidence it appears that the land had previously belonged to one Porter, who deeded it to Van Vleck on some parol understanding, as he claims, that it was to be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Moore v. Detroit Locomotive WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Gates v. ShuttsMichigan Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Spencer v. Alki Point Transportation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Meyer v. RosenbaumMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Brophy Mining Co. v. Brophy & Dale Gold & Silver Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Collins v. Searight-Downs Manfg. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Headley v. HackleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1883

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API