Legal Opinion

Wasserman v. Bartholomew

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1996No. S-5584PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice Pro Tem.

I. INTRODUCTION

Keith Wasserman was mistakenly apprehended by police, who incorrectly believed he was a fleeing felon, as he shopped for groceries. Wasserman and his wife, Kristi Wasser-man, sued local police and state troopers, the City of Fairbanks (the City) and the State of Alaska for the acts of the peace officers. The trial court, sitting without a jury, returned a verdict in favor of the defendants. The Wassermans appeal. They claim that the superior court erred in a number of evidentiary rulings, in denying their post-trial motion to disqualify the…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. United States v. Patricia Campbell HearstCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  3. Adamson v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Petersen v. Mutual Life Insuarance Co. of New YorkAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Robert Shad, Molly Shad, and Samantha Shad v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., a Corporation Milton Ponitz and Lee McMahonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Sykes v. Melba Creek Mining, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Wasserman v. BartholomewAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Cook v. CookAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Liimatta v. VestAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Peterson v. SwarthoutAlaska Supreme Court · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API