Legal Opinion

Liimatta v. Vest

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 2002No. S-9289, S-9320PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

We consider here various evidentiary rulings in a case arising out of a collision between a personal injury plaintiff's bicycle and the defendant's truck Because it was an abuse of discretion to exclude evidence of the plaintiff's pre-accident drug-seeking behavior, and because the error was prejudicial, we reverse the judgment against the defendant and remand for a new trial.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

On July 2, 1997 a truck driven by Into Liimatta collided with a bicycle ridden by Deborah Vest. Vest suffered a broken right clavicle, trauma to her teeth…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Eichel v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. State v. AlexAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Poulin v. ZartmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. O'KELLEYAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Bauman v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1995

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. In Re the Exxon Valdez, Sea Hawk Seafoods, Inc. v. Exxon Corporation and Exxon Shipping Company, and United States of America, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Noffke v. PerezAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Getchell v. LodgeAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Barton v. North Slope Borough School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Jones v. Bowie Industries, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2012

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API