Legal Opinion
Robert Shad, Molly Shad, and Samantha Shad v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., a Corporation Milton Ponitz and Lee McMahon
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 9, 1986No. 85-5652PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEEZER, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs Robert, Molly, and Samantha Shad appeal from a jury verdict in favor of Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. (“DWR”) and two of its account executives. The Shads alleged that DWR account executives churned four Shad accounts between August 1978 and July 1982 in violation of section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b). The assignments of error require us to review discovery procedures, the exclusion of expert testimony, the denial of a motion for mistrial, and the rejection of proffered instructions. We remand for a new trial on account of…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Vincent E. Jenkins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,872 Lila A. Miley v. Oppenheimer & Company, Inc., Anthony L. Geller and John W. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Davis & Cox, a Partnership, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Summa Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee. Chester C. Davis, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Summa Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee. Summa Corporation, Defendant-Counterclaimant/appellant v. Davis & Cox, a Partnership, Chester C. Davis, Maxwell E. Cox, Howard M. Jaffe and Martin Cook, Plaintiffs-Counterdefendants/appellees. Summa Corporation, Hughes Aircraft Corporation, Defendants- Counterclaimants/appellants v. Chester C. Davis, Davis & Cox, Maxwell E. Cox, Howard M. Jaffe and D. Martin Cook, Counterdefendants/appelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Hatch v. Reliance InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Troy Swinton v. Potomac Corporation, Dba Crescent Cardboard Company, Dba crescent/u.s. MatCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Karen Kennedy v. Los Angeles Police Department City of Los Angeles James J. King Stanley A. SchottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Elsayed Mukhtar v. California State University, HaywardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Sulzer Textil A.G. And Sulzer Textile, Inc. v. Picanol N v. Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Gary A. Skillman, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.