Legal Opinion

Henriquez v. Henriquez

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 13, 2010No. 81, September Term, 2009PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATTAGLIA, Judge.

We are asked to consider whether a court award of attorneys’ fees in a divorce and custody proceeding between Jose Henriquez, Petitioner, and Ana Henriquez, Respondent, the prevailing party, to a non-profit organization that provided Mrs. Henriquez with pro bono legal representation, was appropriate under Section 12-103 of the Family Law Article, Maryland Code (1984, 2006 Repl.Vol.). 1

After a trial on issues of custody, visitation, and child support, the Circuit Court for Montgomery County ordered, among other things, that Mr. Henriquez pay $5,000 in attorneys’ fees to the…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Kushell v. Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. Nesbit v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. Morris v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  4. Nova Research, Inc. v. Penske Truck Leasing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  5. Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Campusano v. Lusitano Construction LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  2. Weichert Co. v. FaustCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  3. Schreyer v. ChaplainCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  5. Worsham v. GreenfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API