Legal Opinion
Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission v. Anderson
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided October 19, 2006No. 112, Sept. Term, 2005PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGreene, J.
This matter arises from the Maryland-National Capital Park Police Commission’s (“Commission”) petition for judicial review of an Administrative Hearing Board’s (“Board”) decision. The issue before this Court is whether a conflict exists between the Law Enforcement Officer’s Bill of Rights *177(“LEOBR”), Md.Code (2008) § 3-101 et. seq. of the Public Safety Article, and the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), Md.Code (1984, 2004 Repl.Vol.), § 10-222 of the State Government Article, when an agency pursues an administrative complaint against one of its employees, and after an administrative hearing…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. People's CounselCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Tucker v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Marriott Employees Federal Credit Union v. Motor Vehicle AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Frost v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Maryland Aviation Administration v. NolandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Hamilton v. Mayor of BaltimoreDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- Erie Insurance Exchange v. HeffernanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Koste v. Town of OxfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Frey v. Comptroller of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Polek v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.