Worsham v. Greenfield
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
BELL, C.J. (Retired).
In this case, we must decide whether a party “incurs” litigation costs within the meaning of Maryland Rule 1-341 when those costs are paid, not by that party, but by an *352insurance company on his or her behalf. We shall affirm the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals and hold that, regardless of who pays the attorney fees or of whether the fees are covered and paid pursuant to an insurance policy, attorney fees and litigation expenses are “incurred” within the meaning of Rule 1-341 when the party becomes subject to, or liable for, the services and expenses. In the case…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Lockshin v. SemskerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Kushell v. Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Price v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Adamson v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Witte v. AzarianCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Connors v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Christian v. Maternal-Fetal Med. Assoc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- State v. BravermanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- Brady v. Citizens Union Savings BankMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2015
- Satterfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.