Legal Opinion

Nesbit v. Government Employees Insurance

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 23, 2004No. 131, Sept. Term, 2003PublishedCited by 119 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreene, J.

On February 7, 2003, Richard Nesbit (“Nesbit”) was injured in an automobile accident. Nesbit attempted to recover personal injury protection (“PIP”) benefits from his insurer, Government Employees Insurance Company (“GEICO”). GEICO rejected the PIP claim because Nesbit had no PIP coverage, having signed a PIP waiver on June 15, 1998. Nesbit sued GEICO in the District Court of Maryland sitting in Baltimore County. The parties tried the case on July 3, 2003, and the Court entered judgment on behalf of GEICO. Nesbit noted a de novo appeal in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County on August 7,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. Taylor v. NationsBank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Board of Physician Quality Assurance v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. Frost v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  5. Mayor of Baltimore v. ChaseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by119 opinions

  1. Lee v. ClineCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. Schisler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. Chow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Wheeling v. Selene FinanceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  5. Clancy v. KingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008

114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API