Legal Opinion

Gum, Incorporated v. Felton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 25, 1940No. Appeal, 169PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

Plaintiff corporation filed this bill to restrain its landlord from attempting, by summary process, to collect rent under a lease alleged to have been unauthorized by plaintiff’s board of directors and therefore void. The relief prayed for was granted and this appeal followed.

One-half of the capital stock of plaintiff was owned or controlled by Hamilton and the other half by Bowman. Their relations became hostile 1 with Hamilton wrongfully 2 acting as president and tbe board of six directors equally divided into two unfriendly factions. In those circumstances, on…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bowman v. Gum, IncorporatedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Bowman v. Gum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Culbertson v. CookSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Commonwealth v. SweeneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  5. Bangor & Portland Railway Co. v. American Bangor Slate Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Yarnall v. Yorkshire Worsted MillsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. O'BRIEN v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Accu-Weather, Inc. v. Thomas Broadcasting Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Lebeck v. William A. Jarvis, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Selig v. Philadelphia Title InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API