Legal Opinion
Bowman v. Gum, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 23, 1937No. Appeal, 137PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion bx
Mr. Justice Barnes,
This is the second appeal of the defendants * to this Court in the present case. A statement of the facts of this litigation is contained in the opinion of Mr. Justice Linn, speaking for this Court, in Bowman v. Gum, Incorporated, et al., 321 Pa. 516, but it is necessary to repeat them in part, so that the issues here involved may be understood.
The proceeding was instituted by a stockholder’s bill for the appointment of a receiver for the defendant, Gum, Incorporated, a Pennsylvania corporation (hereafter called Gum). The company was incorporated on June 7, 1932,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Tide Water Pipe Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- McDougall v. Huntingdon & Broad Top R. & C. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- McGowin v. RemingtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1849
- Bowman v. Gum, IncorporatedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Hurst v. BrennenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Wortex Mills, Inc. v. Textile Workers Union of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Union of Russian Societies of St. Michael & St. George, Inc. v. KossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Babin v. City of LancasterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Mower v. MowerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Selheimer v. Manganese Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.