Legal Opinion

Culbertson v. Cook

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 25, 1932No. Appeal, 119PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

The Home Security Investment Company (hereinafter called the company) is a Pennsylvania corporation engaged in the business of lending money upon mortgages, with its principal office in the City of Meadville, Crawford County, Pa. Plaintiff, as receiver of the company, caused to be issued a rule to show cause why the postponement of the lien of a mortgage held by the company upon property in Meadville given by the defendants, Perry D. Cook and Ruby Flower Cook, his wife, to that of another mortgage on the same property given to Mrs. Katherine McNamara (whose…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Reifsnyder v. DoughertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Campbell v. Foster Home Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  3. Zavodnick v. Rose SonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Hill v. EpleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
  5. Tustin v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Ham v. GougeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  2. Schenker v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Gum, Incorporated v. FeltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Zidek v. Forbes National BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Anna Bowman and Doris Bowman v. The Home Life Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API