Legal Opinion

Yarnall v. Yorkshire Worsted Mills

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 1, 1952No. Appeal, 9PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Chidsey,

On May 3, 194-9 a stipulation settling a suit in replevin was entered into signed by then counsel for appellant and counsel for appellee and approved by President Judge Ervin of Delaware County. Appellant on January 12, 1951 filed a petition to set aside this stipulation and reopen the case and a rule was granted. On January 22, 1951 the rule which was previously granted was refused without an answer being filed or a hearing held. This appeal followed.

Prom the allegations in the petition and record papers the following facts appear. On October 1, 1948 an action…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Presbyterian Board v. GilbeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  2. Baumgartner v. WhinneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Township of North Whitehall v. KellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  4. Gum, Incorporated v. FeltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Neel v. CrittendenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Tiernan v. DevoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  2. People v. BowmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Mungin v. Florida East Coast Railway CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1970
  4. School District v. Framlau Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Sustrik v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API