Meinhard, Greeff & Co. v. Higginbotham-Bailey-Logan Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtO’Malley, J.
Two questions are presented: (1) At the time of the service of the process herein, was the defendant, a foreign corporation, doing business in the State to an extent making it amenable to service; and (2) was the person upon whom service was effected a managing agent or cashier within the meaning of section 229 of the Civil Practice Act?
The same questions were raised and presented by the defendant when sued by another party in the City Court. That action resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff therein. On appeal to the Appellate Term, First Department, the judgment was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Fleischmann Construction Co. v. Blauner'sAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- National Furniture Co. v. William Spiegelman & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Hunau v. Northern Region Supply Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sterling Novelty Corp. v. Frank & Hirsch Distributing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Ciprari v. Servicos Aereos Cruzeiro Do Sul, SA (Cruzeiro)District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- Jacobowitz v. ThomsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Greenberg v. Lamson Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947
- McClendon v. the Curtis Bay Towing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.