Legal Opinion

Fleischmann Construction Co. v. Blauner's

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 19, 1919PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Blauner’s, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term, as resettled by an order of said court, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 1st day of July, 1919, con firming the report of a referee finding that the defendant, a foreign corporation, is doing business in the State of New York.

1Opinion of the Court

Dowling, J.:

Defendant is a foreign corporation, organized under the laws of the State of Pennsylvania, conducting á retail department store at Nos. 833-835 Market street, Philadelphia, Penn. It deals in ready-to-wear clothing for ladies, misses and children, and also in hoisery, gloves, underwear and millinery. It does no manufacturing, but buys the goods it sells to its customers. It has no office in New York city. Service of the summons and complaint herein was made on Julius Blauner, president of defendant, at his place of business in the city of New York, where the copartnership of which…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Sterling Novelty Corp. v. Frank & Hirsch Distributing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Ciprari v. Servicos Aereos Cruzeiro Do Sul, SA (Cruzeiro)District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
  3. National Furniture Co. v. William Spiegelman & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  4. Meinhard, Greeff & Co. v. Higginbotham-Bailey-Logan Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  5. Hartstein v. Seidenbach's, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1927

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API