Legal Opinion

Sterling Novelty Corp. v. Frank & Hirsch Distributing Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 26, 1949PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFuld, J.

Whether or not defendant, a foreign corporation, was doing business in this State so as to be subject to the jurisdiction of our courts is the question certified for our determination.

The defendant is a South African importing corporation which does much of its buying in New York, but is concededly not qualified to do business here and has no branch office in this State. Plaintiff began the present action for breach of contract by serving a summons' and complaint upon an officer of a New York corporation which makes purchases for defendant. Urging that such service was not effective,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. Curtis Brown Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Industrial Research Corp. v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1928
  4. Chaplin v. SelznickNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  5. Hamlin v. G. E. Barrett & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Frummer v. Hilton Hotels International, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Simonson v. International BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. Henry R. Jahn & Son, Inc. v. Superior Court of San Mateo CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Augustus Blount v. Peerless Chemicals (p.r.) Inc., and Peerless Oil & Chemical Corp.,defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  5. La Belle Creole International, S. A. v. Attorney-GeneralNew York Court of Appeals · 1961

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API