Legal Opinion

Pacific Coast Co. v. Wells

California Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1901No. S.F. No. 2859PublishedCited by 21 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, C.

The court below sustained a demurrer to the verified petition for a writ of mandate herein, and refused to allow the petitioner to amend. Judgment was thereupon entered in favor of defendant. This appeal is from the judgment. The facts are stated in the petition, substantially, as follows: In the month of March, 1900, plaintiff furnished to the assessor of the city and county of San Francisco a verified statement,'' purporting to set forth all the property owned by it on the' first Monday in March, 1900. In said statement, in the column headed “ List of Personal Property,” appeared…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Otsego County Bank v. Board of Supervisors of Otsego CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Hayes v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Phelan v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Matter of Adams v. . SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Rooney v. SnowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Star-Kist Foods, Inc. v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Brenner v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Stewart Law & Collection Co. v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Associated Oil Co. v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. McCaslin v. DeCampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API