Legal Opinion
McCaslin v. DeCamp
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 20, 1967No. Civ. 668PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGargano, J.
Plaintiffs Central California Irrigation District, a tax-exempt public agency (hereafter referred to as the district), and Lewis V. McCaslin (hereafter referred to as McCaslin) commenced this action by filing a complaint in the Superior Court of Stanislaus County against the assessor, the tax collector and the board of supervisors of said county, to declare void a possessory interest assessment made by the assessor, to enjoin collection of the resulting tax levied against this interest and to enjoin the defendants from making similar assessments in the future. According to the allegations of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Kaiser Co. v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- People v. ShearerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Trabue Pittman Corp. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Knoff v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Board of Supervisors v. ArcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- United States v. County of HumboldtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- English v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- United States v. County of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.