Stewart Law & Collection Co. v. County of Alameda
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. F. B. Ogden, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Action to recover certain taxes assessed by defendant county for road purposes on property situated within the city of Oakland. Defendant interposed a general demurrer to the complaint, which was sustained. Plaintiff failed to amend its complaint,' and judgment passed for defendant, from which this appeal was taken.
It appears from the complaint that prior to the fiscal year 1897-1898 the boundaries of said city were altered so as to include certain territory formerly known as road districts of “Temescal” and “Bay”; that certain persons, plaintiff’s assignors, were during the whole…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hayes v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Board of Commissioners v. ArmStrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- City of Indianapolis v. McAvoyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Lauman v. County of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
- Capeon v. HitchcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Southern Service Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Birch v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Brill v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Brenner v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Roth v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.