Phelan v. City & County of San Francisco
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.-
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The plaintiff seeks by this action to recover from the city and county of San Francisco, and from its tax collector, the sum of sixtv-nine thousand nine hundred and twenty-one dollars and eighteen cents, paid by him under protest for the assessments made upon a certain lot of land belonging to him for the widening of Dupont street during sixteen consccu*3tive years ending in 1893. The complaint recites the proceedings taken by virtue of the act of March 23, 1876 (Stats. 1876, p. 433), for the purpose of determining the amount to be raised for the expense of the improvement, and the property to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bucknall v. StoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Maxwell v. County of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- City and County of San Francisco v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
- McAlpine v. LaydonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Easterbrook v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by19 opinions
- Southern Service Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Standard Box Co. v. Mutual Biscuit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- Spencer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Stewart Law & Collection Co. v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.