Legal Opinion

Peabody v. Carr

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 1934No. Appeal, 186PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Frazer,

Plaintiff sued defendant and two others in assumpsit to recover the sum of $200,000 with interest, alleging in his statement of claim that defendants entered into a conspiracy to defraud him of that amount in connection with a business transaction consummated in December, 1919. See Peabody v. Carr, 313 Pa. 325. The substance of the declaration is that defendant Carr, attorney and adviser of plaintiff, was engaged by the latter to secure an option for tbe purchase of the coal and coke property of the Orient Coke Company; that defendant secured such an option…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. TerheydenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Levine v. Pittsburgh State BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Helfenstein v. Line Mountain Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Stevens v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Peabody v. CarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kittaning Coal Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Boulton v. StarckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Koehring Company v. VentrescaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Townsend v. Universal InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Russ Soda Fountain Co. v. Victor Pastry Shoppe, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API