Legal Opinion

Gross v. Exeter Machine Works, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 30, 1923No. Appeals, Nos. 153 and 281PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Walling,

On December 27,1919, a written contract was executed between Max dross, the plaintiff, and Exeter Machine Works, Inc., located at West Pittston, Pa., by which the latter undertook to make and deliver to the former five hundred complete silk throwing machines, or a total of fifty thousand spindles, for a consideration therein stated. The first two machines were to be delivered on or before February 15, 1920, and at least two machines each and every day thereafter until the contract was filled. Plaintiff advanced the ten thousand dollars as the contract stipulated,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Wright v. General Carbonic Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Keck v. BieberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  3. March v. AllaboughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
  4. Kunkel v. WherrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  5. Ridgeway Dynamo & Engine Co. v. Pennsylvania Cement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Traylor v. GraftonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. Musser Forests, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Riling v. IdellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Levine v. Pittsburgh State BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Michelin Tire Co. v. SchulzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API