Legal Opinion

City Electric v. Industrial Indemnity Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1984No. 18610PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice:

This is an action under the former public contractors’ bond statutes 1 in which plaintiff City Electric, a material supplier, seeks recovery against a general contractor and its surety2 for the bálance owing on materials and supplies alleged to have been furnished to a subcontractor.

On or about the 22nd day of August, 1979, defendant Valley Builders, Inc. (hereinafter “Valley”), a general contractor, entered into a contract with the North San-pete School District to construct a new elementary school building in Pairview, Utah. On that occasion, a performance bond was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Western Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  2. Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. P & H SUPPLY, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  3. Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. United States for Use of Crane CoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  4. Panhandle Pipe and Steel, Inc. v. JeskoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Bill Nay & Sons Excavating v. Neeley Construction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Buehner Block Co. v. UWC ASSOCIATESUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. O'NEAL v. Division of Family ServicesUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. MenziesUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Harline v. CampbellUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Weese v. Davis County CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API