Legal Opinion

Harline v. Campbell

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1986No. 19576PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice:

Defendants appeal the judgment of the district court which determined that plaintiff and defendant Lewis E. Campbell (“Campbell”) were engaged in a joint venture to develop and sell real property and that plaintiff had a protectible interest in the subject property. The central issue on appeal is that of the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment of the trial court.

The facts are not in material dispute. In 1978, Gary L. Carson Investment Co. (“Carson”) executed three promissory notes and trust deeds in favor of Bank of America Mortgage (“BA Mortgage”) to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Scharf v. BMG Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Bassett v. BakerUtah Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Penelko, Inc. v. John Price Associates, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Shell Oil Co. v. StifflerUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Bennion v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. MacK v. Utah State Department of CommerceUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Sampson v. RichinsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  3. Envirotech Corp. v. CallahanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  4. Ellsworth Paulsen Construction Co. v. 51-SPR-L.L.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Reynolds v. WoodallCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API