Panhandle Pipe and Steel, Inc. v. Jesko
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WATSON, Justice.
Panhandle Pipe and Steel, Inc., appellant here, as plaintiff below, sought to foreclose a materialmen’s lien against the defendants for the cost of well pipe sold to defendants’ well driller. Panhandle alleged in its complaint that defendants Rudolph Jesko and Gladys Jesko were the owners of the lands described, that the Jeskos had contracted with Guy Edwards to drill their well, and that on or about March 5, 1965, Panhandle had furnished to Edwards “pipe used as casing in the wells drilled by Guy Edwards on the defendants’ above mentioned property * *
The parties…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Medler v. HenryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
- Holmes v. RichetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Frederick v. Younger Van LinesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- Fred Huber v. American President Lines, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- White v. City of LovingtonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Camino Real Mobile Home Park Partnership v. WolfeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- M & M Rental Tools, Inc. v. Milchem, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- Chief Industries, Inc. v. SchwendimanIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Padilla v. RRA, INC.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
- Branch v. MaysNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.