Legal Opinion

Panhandle Pipe and Steel, Inc. v. Jesko

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1969No. 8687PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WATSON, Justice.

Panhandle Pipe and Steel, Inc., appellant here, as plaintiff below, sought to foreclose a materialmen’s lien against the defendants for the cost of well pipe sold to defendants’ well driller. Panhandle alleged in its complaint that defendants Rudolph Jesko and Gladys Jesko were the owners of the lands described, that the Jeskos had contracted with Guy Edwards to drill their well, and that on or about March 5, 1965, Panhandle had furnished to Edwards “pipe used as casing in the wells drilled by Guy Edwards on the defendants’ above mentioned property * *

The parties…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Medler v. HenryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Holmes v. RichetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Frederick v. Younger Van LinesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Fred Huber v. American President Lines, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  5. White v. City of LovingtonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Camino Real Mobile Home Park Partnership v. WolfeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  2. M & M Rental Tools, Inc. v. Milchem, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Chief Industries, Inc. v. SchwendimanIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Padilla v. RRA, INC.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Branch v. MaysNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API