Legal Opinion

Kantlehner v. Bisceglia

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 26, 1951No. Civ. 14492PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.

Plaintiffs had judgment against appellants for $12,000 awarded by a jury for fraudulent representations in the sale of an orchard property for the contract price of $72,000 which was reduced to $68,885 by the adjustment later referred to. The property was represented to contain 65.86 acres but when the title report was received by appellants it developed that it contained less than 61 acres and a survey showed the exact acreage to be 60.702. Appellants, who are the real estate agents who handled the transaction, sought to prove that plaintiffs had knowledge of the shortage in acreage before…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ernst v. SearleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. California Trust Co. v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Grupe v. GlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Wolfsen v. HathawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Deevy v. TassiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Helene Marceau Sidebotham v. W. L. Robison, Administrator of the Estate of Robert Sidebotham, Deceased, and Robert Sidebotham and James SidebothamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  2. Alfaro v. Community Housing Improvement System & Planning Assn., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Walpole v. Prefab Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Casey v. Overhead Door Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Wright v. LoweCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API