Legal Opinion

Casey v. Overhead Door Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 12, 1999No. E021287PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RAMIREZ, P. J.

Plaintiffs William Casey et al., a group of homeowners, filed an action against defendant and others claiming strict liability and negligence for defects in the manufacture of component parts of and in the construction of plaintiffs’ homes. Plaintiffs settled their claims with all defendants save Overhead Door Corporation (hereinafter Overhead).1 Prior to trial the court granted summary adjudication in favor of Overhead on plaintiffs’ strict liability cause of action. At the time of trial the court refused to permit plaintiffs to proceed on the cross-complaint that had…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Morehart v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Kriegler v. Eichler Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Wells Fargo & Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Ashland Chemical Co. v. ProvenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Platte Anchor Bolt, Inc. v. IHI, INC.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
  3. Aas v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Jimenez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Crawford v. Weather Shield Mfg., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2008

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API