Legal Opinion
Snohomish County v. Rugg
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 9, 2002No. 49522-4-IPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Kennedy, J. —
Snohomish County brought suit to enforce its notice and order charging Mr. and Mrs. Bruce Rugg with illegal storage and/or basing of commercial vehicles on their residentially zoned property and illegal grading without a permit. The trial court granted summary judgment to Snohomish County against the Ruggs, concluding that “there is only one result you could reach from this.” We agree, and affirm the order granting summary judgment to the county.
FACTS
The Ruggs own a five-acre parcel located at the end of a dead-end gravel road, in an area of Snohomish that is zoned *220“Rural-5…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Grimwood v. University of Puget Sound, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1988
- Kruse v. HempWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Ellis v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Kennedy v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1991
3Cited by22 opinions
- Carlton v. BlackWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re Estate of BlackWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Cornish College of the Arts v. 1000 Virginia Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Ainsworth v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Johnson v. Recreational Equipment, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.