Legal Opinion

Ainsworth v. Progressive Casualty Insurance

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 10, 2014No. 69433-2-IPublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLau, J.

¶1 Progressive Casualty Insurance Company appeals the order granting partial summary judgment in Tyler Ainsworth’s favor on his income continuation (wage loss) benefit claim under applicable provisions of his auto*57mobile insurance policy.1 We hold that (1) the plain meaning of the relevant policy provisions entitles Ainsworth to income continuation benefits under the circumstances here, (2) Progressive unreasonably denied coverage and payment of benefits under the Insurance Fair Conduct Act (IFCA), RCW 48.30.015, (3) no material fact issues exist, and (4) Progressive failed to preserve its…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Queen City Farms, Inc. v. Central Nat'l Ins. Co. of OmahaWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. McDonald v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Leingang v. PIERCE CO. MED. BUREAU, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1997

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Perez-Crisantos v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2017
  2. McLaughlin v. Travelers Commercial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Hanson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2017
  4. Langley v. Geico General InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2015
  5. Workland & Witherspoon, PLLC v. Evanston InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2015

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API