Legal Opinion

Carlton v. Black

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 2004No. 74009-7PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 The Columbia County Superior Court admitted a 1992 will, signed by Margaret Black, to probate shortly after Margaret’s death in October 2000. The court subsequently admitted a 1993 lost will, purporting to be *157Margaret’s last will and testament, on summary judgment and awarded attorney fees to Richard Burns, the personal representative under the 1992 will. On appeal, the Court of Appeals reversed the summary judgment and the attorney fee award and remanded the case with instructions that all issues pertaining to the will should be decided in one proceeding. We affirm the Court of Appeals…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Philip R. Visser v. Packer Engineering Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  3. Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. LaPlante v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Balise v. UnderwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1963

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Roberson v. PerezWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Roberson v. PerezWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. In Re Estate of BlackWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Williams v. Leone & Keeble, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Williams v. Leone & Keeble, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2011

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API