Legal Opinion
Patten v. Lederle Laboratories
District Court, D. Utah
Decided November 2, 1987No. Civ. 85-C-0883GPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
J. THOMAS GREENE, District Judge.
This matter came before the court on July 14, 1987 pursuant to defendant’s Motion for Instruction. Lederle Laboratories (“Lederle”) was represented by JoAnn Zaleskas, Thomas L. Kay and Mark 0. Morris. Clinton and Shanna Patten (the “Pattens”) were represented by Lynn C. Harris and Boyd McDowell III. The parties submitted memoranda and presented oral argument, after which the court took the matter under advisement and reserved ruling on the motion until the court had heard evidence at the time of trial. Lederle also represented at…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- McNeese v. Board of Education for Community Unit School District 187 CahokiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Meredith v. Winter HavenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Feldman v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Wyeth Laboratories v. ReyesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Reyes v. Wyeth LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Kociemba v. G.D. Searle & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1988
- Grundberg v. Upjohn Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
- Tansy v. Dacomed Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Hill v. Searle LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- Mele v. Howmedica, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.