Hill v. Searle Laboratories
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge.
In 1981, a Searle-manufactured copper intrauterine device (IUD), a CU-7, was implanted in Connie Hill. Three years later, she gave birth to a child. The next day, she had tubal ligation surgery. During this surgery, it was discovered that the CU-7 had perforated Hill’s uterus and was partially embedded in her small bowel. Hill and her husband then brought suit against Searle. After six months of discovery, Searle requested and was granted summary judgment. 686 F.Supp. 720. The district court reasoned that the CU-7 was a prescription drug product falling within the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Feldman v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Reyes v. Wyeth LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Article of Drug . . . Bacto-UnidiskSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Craft v. PeeblesHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- Humes v. ClintonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
- Freeman v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- West v. Searle & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Savina v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.