Legal Opinion

Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance v. Kompus

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 22, 1984No. Docket 65090, 65269, 66471, 66509, 66818, 69239PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a consolidated appeal as of right by several insurance companies and individuals pursuant to GCR 1963, 518.2. The appeals arose out of several orders declaring respective duties to defendant Dr. Larry Kompus, the insured, by the insurance companies involved.

During the period from 1973 to 1979, Kompus allegedly engaged in homosexual practices with several of his patients under the guise of therapy. Kompus was convicted of third-degree criminal sexual conduct in connection with these activities. Lawsuits alleging assault, malpractice and other claims were filed against Kompus by five…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Guerdon Industries, Inc. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Morrill v. GallagherMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Cotton v. KamblyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Fadden v. Cambridge Mutual Fire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Vigilant Insurance v. KamblyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance Co. v. HallmanTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Allstate Insurance v. FreemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Horace Mann Insurance v. LeeberWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Hawkeye-Security Insurance v. Vector Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Greenman v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API