Legal Opinion
Vigilant Insurance v. Kambly
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided April 5, 1982No. Docket 52974, 53014PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtH. R. Gage, J.
Plaintiff filed an action for declaratory relief seeking to be absolved from liability under the professional liability insurance policy it issued to defendant, Arnold Kambly, M.D. The provisions of the policy which are in issue read as follows:
"The company will pay on behalf of the insured all sums which the insured shall become legally obligated to pay as damages because of * * * Injury arising out of the rendering of or failure to render, professional services by the individual insured * * *, and the company shall have the right and duty to defend any suit against the insured seeking such…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cotton v. KamblyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Bowman v. Preferred Risk Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CoonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- Western Fire Insurance v. J. R. Snyder, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- Smillie v. Travelers InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Princeton Insurance v. ChunmuangSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Roe v. Federal InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. TorpocoTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
- L.L. v. Medical Protective Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
- Sandra B. Andrews and Kenneth M. Andrews v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.