Legal Opinion

Fadden v. Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1966PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLawrence H. Cooke, J.

In this action by a judgment creditor, based on an insurance policy with liability coverage which defendant had issued, and concerning which it is claimed that the judgment debtor against whom plaintiff obtained his judgment is an insured, defendant moves for summary judgment.

Lewis Burgess sustained serious leg injuries on June 30, 1962 while upon a parcel near Bolton Landing owned by plaintiff Joseph R. Fadden and Eleanor T. Fadden, husband and wife, and when struck by a power saw operated by their 15-year-old son Joseph R. Fadden, Jr. Suit was instituted against the father and son,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Von Baumbach v. Sargent Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Hornstein v. PodwitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. General Phoenix Corp. v. CabotNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  4. Lachs v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
  5. Kenyon v. Knights Templar & Masonic Mutual Aid Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Green v. Santa Fe Industries, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. McGrath v. GoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Gulf Insurance Company v. TilleyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1967
  4. Asbury v. Indiana Union Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Lutsky v. Blue Cross Hospital Service, Inc. of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API