Legal Opinion

Kahan v. Rosenstiel

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided May 29, 1968No. Civ. A. 3509PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CALEB M. WRIGHT, Chief Judge. The Dorothy H. and Lewis Rosenstiel Foundation, the appearing individuals, 1 and the Glen Alden Corporation, defendants herein upon whom service has been made, have moved to dismiss or stay the prosecution of this suit and for a protective order. 2

Defendants’ motions are premised upon the fact that plaintiff Kahan has filed a companion suit against them in the Delaware Court of Chancery,/ and further that at least two other actions, involving the same operative facts as underlie the instant action, have been filed against them in the Chancery…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mottolese v. KaufmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  2. P. Beiersdorf & Co., Inc. v. McGohey JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  3. Kaufman v. ShoenbergDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1954
  4. Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. Cove Vitamin & Pharmaceutical, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Movielab, Inc. v. Berkey Photo, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  2. United States v. Cargill, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1981
  3. Wellington Computer Graphics, Inc. v. ModellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  4. Guenveur v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1982
  5. Puma v. MarriottDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API