Legal Opinion

P. Beiersdorf & Co., Inc. v. McGohey Judge

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 15, 1951No. 21901PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

1. For purposes of this decision, the facts may be simply stated. Duke Laboratories, Inc., sued P. Beiersdorf & Co., Inc., in the State Court of Connecticut, asking a declaratory judgment that Duke had not infringed certain registered trademarks, that Duke owned these trade-marks although they had been issued to Beiers-dorf, and that a contract between the parties (relative to the manufacture and distribution of the articles under the trademarks) was either invalid or had been completely performed. While this suit was pending, some two months later Beiersdorf sued Duke,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McClellan v. CarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Maggio v. ZeitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Dickinson v. Petroleum Conversion Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. In Re HohorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Mottolese v. KaufmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Ppg Industries, Inc. v. Continental Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. Calvert Fire Insurance Company v. American Mutual Reinsurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  3. Lyons v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  4. Mach-Tronics, Inc. v. ZirpoliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  5. Universal Gypsum of Georgia, Inc. v. American Cyanamid Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API