Legal Opinion
Mottolese v. Kaufman
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 6, 1949No. 21334PublishedCited by 106 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
L. HAND, Chief Judge.
This is a petition for mandamus to direct the respondent, Judge Kaufman, to proceed in due course with the hearing and trial of an action in the District Court for the Southern District of New York, between Mottolese, the petitioner, as plaintiff, and Harry Preston and others, as defendants. The petitioner sought by appeal to review the same order which this petition brings up; and although we dismissed the appeal last January,1 we suggested that mandamus might be an appropriate remedy. The petitioner has followed that suggestion without, however, renewing her motion…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- United States v. Carroll Towing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Browning v. NavarroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Schneider v. SearsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Magnetic Engineering & Manufacturing Co. v. Dings Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Nederlandse Erts-Tankersmaatschappij, N v. V. Isbrandtsen Company, Inc. And Jacob IsbrandtsenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.