Legal Opinion

Puma v. Marriott

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided September 15, 1972No. Civ. A. 3275PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CALEB M. WRIGHT, Chief Judge.

This is a derivative stockholders’ suit brought on behalf of Marriott-Hot Shoppes, Inc. (Marriott) and arising out of Marriott’s purchase at an allegedly unfair price of the stock of six corporations principally owned by insiders of Marriott. The plaintiff, John Puma, is the owner and holder of record of several hundred shares of Marriott common stock and was a Marriott stockholder at the time of the transactions involved herein. The individual defendants include all of the directors of Marriott at the time of the purchase and all of the insiders and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Henry S. Cram v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd., Robert S. Wahab, Jr. v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  3. Kahan v. RosenstielDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1968
  4. Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bacardi v. Bacardi Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1988
  2. Atlas Corp. v. Blasius Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API