Legal Opinion

Manzer v. Phillips

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1905No. Docket No. 16PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Shiawassee; Smith, J. Case by Mary Manzer against Anna Phillips and others ■under the civil-damage act. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBlaib, J.

This is an action under the civil-damage act, brought by Mary Manzer against Anna Phillips, a saloon keeper, and Austin Phillips and George Setzer, her bondsmen. It is the contention of plaintiff', and there was evidence tending to prove, that on the 4th day of August, 1903, her husband, then being a person in the habit of getting intoxicated, visited the saloon of defendant Anna Phillips, and while there became so intoxicated as to be unconscious for several hours upon liquors sold him by said defendant or her servants, during which period of time he either lost or had taken from him the sum…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Boydan v. HaberstumpfMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Thomas v. DansbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Rosecrants v. ShoemakerMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Larzelere v. KirchgessnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Weiser v. WelchMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. GrondinMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Greene v. RicherMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. McNetton v. HerbMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Pearson v. SchoenbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Montross v. AlexanderMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API