Montross v. Alexander
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Oakland; Smith, J. Case by Mary A. Montross against Hugh Alexander, impleaded with Charles Crofoot and Fred Cox, under the civil-damage act. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The plaintiff sued Alexander, a liquor dealer, and the other defendants, sureties upon his statutory bond, for damages alleged to have been caused to her by said Alexander through the sale of intoxicating liquors to her husband. She recovered a judgment for $1,610.75, damages and costs, and an appeal has been taken by said Alexander.
The questions raised upon this record relate to the subject of damages, and the claim is not made in defendant’s statement of facts that the defendant was not properly found liable for some amount. Objection was made to many questions asked by plaintiff’s counsel…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Boydan v. HaberstumpfMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Larzelere v. KirchgessnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Johnson v. SchultzMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Manzer v. PhillipsMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by3 opinions
- Baker v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Johnson v. GrondinMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Pearson v. SchoenbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1911