Johnson v. Grondin
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Schoolcraft; Oren, J. Case by Anna Johnson against Philip Grondin and the Michigan Bonding & Surety Company for illegal sales of liquor to plaintiff’s husband. Judgment for plaintiff, defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
This action is brought under the provisions of the civil-damage law (Act No. 313, Pub. Acts 1887, § 20, 2 Comp. Laws, § 5398) against the keeper of a saloon and his bondsmen. The declaration consists of two counts. The first count alleges that on, to wit, May 1, 1909, and continuously from that time to the time of the commencement of suit, which was on November 4, 1910, the defendant Philip Grondin was engaged in the business and occupation of selling spirituous and intoxicating liquors at retail in the township of Seney, in Schoolcraft county; and that to enable him to engage in said…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rice v. RiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Boydan v. HaberstumpfMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Larzelere v. KirchgessnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Ford v. CheeverMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Hilliker v. FarrMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Podbielski v. Argyle Bowl, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Herbert v. DurgisMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- State v. GleenWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Rauhala v. MakiMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Bales v. EvansMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.