Boydan v. Haberstumpf
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ionia; Davis, J. Case by Minnie Boydan against John Haberstumpf, a saloon keeper, and Frank E. Schmoltz and Stephen M. Bayard, his bondsmen, for the illegal sale of liquor to plaintiff’s husband. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, C. J.
This is an action against a saloon keeper and his bondsmen to recover damages for illegal sales to the plaintiff’s husband. The record contains 109 assignments of error, which, it is safe to say, is at least 100 more than raise any doubtful questions. Undoubtedly, counsel have a legal right to indulge in as many assignments of error as they choose; but, when error is assigned upon every ruling of the court in the progress of a trial, it imposes upon the appellate court the burden of practically retrying the entire case, reviewing every ruling upon the admission of testimony, and every…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Larzelere v. KirchgessnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Jones v. WisnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Stern v. FrazerMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by22 opinions
- Peisner v. Detroit Free Press, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Poledna v. Bendix Aviation Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Peisner v. Detroit Free Press, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Ilins v. BurnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- Layton v. Cregan Mallory Co., Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.