Legal Opinion

McNetton v. Herb

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1909No. Docket No. 71PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Allegan; Padgham, J. Case by Sylvia L. McNetton against Joseph Herb, principal, and Aaron Jones and Joseph Gietzen, sureties, under the civil-damage act. A judgment for plaintiff is reviewed by defendants on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, C. J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages from defendant, a saloon keeper, and his bondsmen, alleged to have resulted from unlawful sales by defendant Herb to her husband from May 1,1907, to November 15, 1907. Plaintiff secured a verdict and judgment in *527her favor, and defendants bring the record to this court for review upon writ of error.

Counsel for appellants divide their argument in support of their assignments of error into three branches, and we consider them in the same order.

First. Rulings on the admission and rejection of testimony. Assignments of error 20-24 relate to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ganssly v. PerkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Kehrig v. PetersMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Radley v. SeiderMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Manzer v. PhillipsMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Van Alstine v. KanieckiMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Spencer v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Spencer v. SimmonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Hakliv v. WoznakMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Gregory v. McNittMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API