Legal Opinion
Moore v. Motz
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 23, 2006No. Civil Action 05-2031 (PLF)PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff in this action seeks recovery of money damages from numerous public officials of the federal, Maryland state, North Carolina state and Baltimore city governments. 1 Although plaintiffs pro se complaints are vaguely worded and difficult (at best) to decipher, plaintiff appears to assert due process and equal protection claims arising from several perceived instances of “judicial racism” and from the United States Department of Justice’s handling of certain civil rights claims filed by plaintiff. See Complaint (“Compl.”) ¶¶ 5, 46; Amended…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Busby v. Capital One, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Gomez v. AragonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Lans v. Adduci Mastriani & Schaumberg L.L.P.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Banks v. LappinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Walton v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.