Legal Opinion
Gomez v. Aragon
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 25, 2010No. Civil Action 09-2010 (RWR)PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Pro se plaintiffs Kenneth and Lynette Gomez and pro se plaintiff-inter venor Richard Tast bring claims for damages and injunctive relief against six named and five unnamed New Mexico citizens, alleging that the defendants are “engaged in an insurrection against” the constitutions of the state of New Mexico and the United States because the defendants are discharging their duties as state and federal officials without a penal bond, which the plaintiffs assert that the New Mexico state constitution and federal law require. 1 The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Wultz v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Jenkins v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Walsh v. HageeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Ahuruonye v. U.S. Dep't of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Bradley v. DewineDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.