Legal Opinion
Lomanco, Inc. v. Missouri Pacific Railroad
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided July 1, 1983No. LR-C-82-509PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROY, District Judge.
The instant case involves a claim for damages by Lomanco, Inc., of Jacksonville, Arkansas, against the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company (“MoPac”), Dart Orient Services, Inc. (“Dart”), and Carland Shipping, Ltd. (“Carland”). As the pleadings reflect, on March 23,1981, Lomanco ordered 360 ceiling fans from a manufacturing company located in Hong Kong (Fan Tat Manufacturing Company, which is not a party to this suit). The fans were loaded at Hong Kong upon the S.S. Oriental Exporter, a container ship owned by Carland which transported them to Seattle,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Gates Learjet Corp. v. JensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Burton v. Northern Dutchess HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- China National Chartering Corp. v. Pactrans Air & Sea, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- In re the Arbitration between Intercarbon Bermuda, Ltd. & Caltex Trading & Transport Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Bayou Steel Corp. v. M/V AmstelvoornCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.