Dual Manufacturing and Engineering, Inc. And the Berkline Corporation v. Burris Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SPRECHER, Circuit Judge.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the alleged infringer has committed acts of infringement within, and has a regular and established place of business within, the Northern District of Illinois to satisfy the patent infringement venue statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b).
The plaintiffs, Dual Manufacturing and Engineering, Inc. and the Berkline Corporation, brought this action for patent infringement against the defendant, Burris Industries, Inc., a manufacturer of furniture, including a sliding reclining chair.
The subject of the patent is a complete reclining chair…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Shaw v. Quincy Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Stonite Products Co. v. Melvin Lloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Brunette MacHine Works, Ltd. v. Kockum Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Schnell v. Peter Eckrich & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Brunswick Corp. v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1983
- S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Gillette Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
- Clopay Corp. v. Newell Companies, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1981
- Fairfax Dental (Ireland) Ltd. v. S.J. Filhol Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 1986
- Mida Manufacturing Co. v. Femic, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.