Legal Opinion

Dual Manufacturing and Engineering, Inc. And the Berkline Corporation v. Burris Industries, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 23, 1976No. 75--1727PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPRECHER, Circuit Judge.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether the alleged infringer has committed acts of infringement within, and has a regular and established place of business within, the Northern District of Illinois to satisfy the patent infringement venue statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b).

The plaintiffs, Dual Manufacturing and Engineering, Inc. and the Berkline Corporation, brought this action for patent infringement against the defendant, Burris Industries, Inc., a manufacturer of furniture, including a sliding reclining chair.

The subject of the patent is a complete reclining chair…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Shaw v. Quincy Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Stonite Products Co. v. Melvin Lloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Brunette MacHine Works, Ltd. v. Kockum Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Schnell v. Peter Eckrich & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Brunswick Corp. v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1983
  2. S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Gillette Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
  3. Clopay Corp. v. Newell Companies, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1981
  4. Fairfax Dental (Ireland) Ltd. v. S.J. Filhol Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 1986
  5. Mida Manufacturing Co. v. Femic, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API