Legal Opinion

Knoke v. Swan

California Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1935No. L. A. 12955PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an action to quiet title to a lot in the city of San Francisco. Defendant is the record owner of the property. Plaintiff’s chief claim of title is through a tax deed. The record shows, however, that the land was sold .for two cents less than the legal amount of taxes, penalties and costs due at the time of sale. The question is whether this error renders the sale invalid.

Were this point newly presented, we should hesitate to declare void a title founded on proceedings where the error was so small. However, it has been several times decided in this state that the maxim “de…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chapman v. JocelynCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Miller v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Granger v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Gottstein v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Myran v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hall v. ChamberlainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. State Ex Rel. Milchem Inc. v. Third Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1968
  3. California Maryland Funding, Inc. v. LoweCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Yorba v. Anaheim Union Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Biaggi v. PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API