Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Milchem Inc. v. Third Judicial District Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1968No. 5467 and 5483PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Mowbray, J.:

Respondents Roberts, Lauritzen, and Thomas commenced an eminent domain action under NRS 516.010-516.060 against the petitioners. Petitioner Milchem Incorporated is the present owner of the property. Petitioner Miller is one of Milchem’s predecessors of tide.

These respondents filed a notice of location in 1963 for certain minerals on Miller’s land. Later that year a certificate of location was recorded for another claim on the land. One year later the respondents filed their only proof of annual labor. In late 1966, after Milchem acquired title, another…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Burke v. Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Dayton Gold & Silver Mining Co. v. SeawellNevada Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Smith v. PattonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Summitt v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Jersey City Redevelopment Agency v. KuglerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  3. State v. GlusmanNevada Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Anaya v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Sheriff, Clark County v. LuqmanNevada Supreme Court · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API