Legal Opinion

Yorba v. Anaheim Union Water Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1953No. L. A. 22300PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Plaintiffs are the owners of 21 parcels of land located on the north side of the Santa Ana River in Orange County. In 1874 this land was all riparian to the river and consisted of the Prudencio Yorba, Vicente Yorba, and William McKey allotments of the Rancho Canon de Santa Ana. These allotments were contiguous and each abutted on the river. They were brought under the common ownership of Prudencio Yorba by 1879, and since that date plaintiffs have succeeded to his interest. Approximately 5 miles upstream to the east of the easterly border of plaintiffs’ land is the intake of defendant Anaheim…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Alta Land & Water Co. v. HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Spotts v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Granger v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Gibbs v. LesterTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  5. Newman v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Eugene Eisler and Elizabeth Eisler v. Nathan StritzlerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
  2. Hill v. AllanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. California Maryland Funding, Inc. v. LoweCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Welsher v. GlickmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Chapin v. LetcherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API